Our impact
For more almost 60 years, we have been building innovative solutions to the biggest environmental challenges — from the soil to the sky.
About us
Guided by science and economics, and committed to climate justice, we work in the places, on the projects and with the people that can make the biggest difference.
Get involved
If we act now — together — there’s still time to build a future where people, the economy and the Earth can all thrive. Every one of us has a role to play. Choose yours.
News and stories
Stay informed and get inspired with our in-depth reporting about the people and ideas making a difference, insight from our experts and the latest environmental progress.
  • Blogging the science and policy of global warming

    Delaying smog standards risks lives, jeopardizes Americans’ health

    Posted: in Clean Air Act, Health, Partners for Change, Policy, Smog

    Written By

    Mandy Warner

    Share

    Twenty-six. That is how many smog-related air quality alerts were forecast across our country for one single day earlier this week.

    From Pennsylvania to Rhode Island, “action days” were called urging “sensitive groups” (including children, people who are active outdoors, older Americans, and people with heart or lung disease) to reduce their time spent outdoors.

    Smog is a dangerous air pollutant linked to premature deaths, asthma attacks, lower birth weight in infants, and serious heart and lung diseases.

    Smog forms when industrial emissions from power plants, factories, cars, and other sources react with heat and sunlight in the atmosphere.

    There have already been many alerts across the U.S. this year for smog pollution, and “smog season” has just begun. That shows we have more work to do to clean the air and protect our families and communities.

    That is why it is disturbing to hear that EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt has decided to delay implementation of the updated smog standards by one year.

    According to the American Lung Association’s 2017 State of the Air Report [PDF], more than one-third of all Americans live in areas with unhealthful levels of smog. More than 116 million people live in counties that received a grade of “F” for smog levels.

    A one-year delay in the implementation of anticipated pollution from the smog standards would mean:

    • 660 more deaths
    • 230,000 asthma attacks among children
    • 180,000 missed work or school days

    These are real lives being affected by Administrator Pruitt’s irresponsible actions.

    The smog standards are driven by medical science. Here are some of the medical and health associations that supported strengthening the ozone standards:

    • The American Thoracic Society
    • American Academy of Pediatrics
    • American Medical Association
    • American Heart Association
    • American Lung Association
    • American Public Health Association
    • Children’s Environmental Health Network
    • National Association of County and City Health Officials
    • Trust for America’s Health
    • Health Care Without Harm
    • Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America
    • American College of Chest Physicians
    • American College of Preventive Medicine
    • American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
    • American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation
    • National Association for the Medical Direction of Respiratory Care
    • Society of Physicians for Social Responsibility

    EPA’s mission is to protect public health and the environment. Administrator Pruitt’s decision to delay the smog standards runs counter to that bi-partisan, four-and-a-half decade mission. It also runs counter to the recommendations of leading medical and public health associations.

    The successful history of implementing the Clean Air Act shows that states have the flexibility to design tailored solutions to address smog pollution, and that dramatic pollution reductions go hand-in-hand with a strong economy.

    We need to reduce the amount of smog in our air – and to achieve that goal, we need EPA to lead.

    One Comment

    1. Bob Meinetz
      Posted June 20, 2017 at 10:47 pm | Permalink

      Mandy, when EDF offers no solutions but lip service, what good will “standards” do? What good will appealing to the EPA to “lead” when it’s been neutered by the most shameful, ignorant president in U.S. history?

      EDF’s continuing refusal to acknowledge renewables won’t cut it in the eastern U.S., that closing existing carbon-free nuclear plants (like Three Mile Island and Davis-Besse) will do more destruction than replacing coal with gas in Ohio and Pennsylvania combined, is an embarrassment.

      Stop whining and come up with a policy that makes sense.