<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Infographic: Carbon Cap Leads to Jobs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2009/05/22/infographic-carbon-cap-leads-to-jobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2009/05/22/infographic-carbon-cap-leads-to-jobs/</link>
	<description>Blogging the science and policy of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:13:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by climatebill</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2009/05/22/infographic-carbon-cap-leads-to-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-5522</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by climatebill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2009/05/22/infographic-carbon-cap-leads-to-jobs/#comment-5522</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by climatebill [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by climatebill [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt Gilbert</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2009/05/22/infographic-carbon-cap-leads-to-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-5396</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Gilbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 19:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2009/05/22/infographic-carbon-cap-leads-to-jobs/#comment-5396</guid>
		<description>All of this euphoria is nice, but there are two serious problems facing the environmental movement at this time.  They are:

   1. In the real world, (Spain which is well ahead of us  in implementing green technologies, etc.), they found that they eliminated about 2.5 jobs for every green job created.  Do we have a solution for this?

   2. Right now the biggest obstacle to implementing green technologies is the environmental movement.  There are now 65 major green projects challenged in the courts by environmentalists.  Typical is the one in Oregon where a planned mountain ridge, (where the wind is), wind farm is opposed as unsightly.  Environmentalists there want to move it to the low lands near a city, (where the wind isn&#039;t).  Another is the establishment of solar collectors in the southwest, near national parks, etc.  Solar collectors need to be where the sun shines, not where it doesn&#039;t.

   What is the program?  Wind generators work only about 28% of the time in more or less ideal locations.  Changing the the,location can double, triple or even quadruple the number of wind farms needed.  What land will be taken?  Is there a concerted plan, or will environmentalists continue to fight each other, one side pushing a project, the other fighting it in court?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of this euphoria is nice, but there are two serious problems facing the environmental movement at this time.  They are:</p>
<p>   1. In the real world, (Spain which is well ahead of us  in implementing green technologies, etc.), they found that they eliminated about 2.5 jobs for every green job created.  Do we have a solution for this?</p>
<p>   2. Right now the biggest obstacle to implementing green technologies is the environmental movement.  There are now 65 major green projects challenged in the courts by environmentalists.  Typical is the one in Oregon where a planned mountain ridge, (where the wind is), wind farm is opposed as unsightly.  Environmentalists there want to move it to the low lands near a city, (where the wind isn&#039;t).  Another is the establishment of solar collectors in the southwest, near national parks, etc.  Solar collectors need to be where the sun shines, not where it doesn&#039;t.</p>
<p>   What is the program?  Wind generators work only about 28% of the time in more or less ideal locations.  Changing the the,location can double, triple or even quadruple the number of wind farms needed.  What land will be taken?  Is there a concerted plan, or will environmentalists continue to fight each other, one side pushing a project, the other fighting it in court?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VE</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2009/05/22/infographic-carbon-cap-leads-to-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-5385</link>
		<dc:creator>VE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 18:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2009/05/22/infographic-carbon-cap-leads-to-jobs/#comment-5385</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m always curious about how much polution is created by the manufacturing and transportation of the wind turbines and other solutions.

VE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m always curious about how much polution is created by the manufacturing and transportation of the wind turbines and other solutions.</p>
<p>VE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->