<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links: Cool Graphics and Magic Tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2009/03/06/links-cool-graphics-and-magic-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2009/03/06/links-cool-graphics-and-magic-tax/</link>
	<description>Blogging the science and policy of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:13:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kira Marchenese</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2009/03/06/links-cool-graphics-and-magic-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-2598</link>
		<dc:creator>Kira Marchenese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2009/03/06/links-cool-graphics-and-magic-tax/#comment-2598</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the questions. 

You&#039;re right that transportation is a major source of GHGs -- in the U.S. transportation is roughly 30 percent of all global warming pollution. USCAP (EDF is a member) has a blueprint for legislation that puts transportation fuels under an economy-wide emissions cap, ensuring that we get needed reductions in the trans sector. You can read more about that in the blueprint: http://us-cap.org/pdf/USCAP_Blueprint.pdf. 
 
On your second question, Congress has yet to decide among the many options for how to distribute allowances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the questions. </p>
<p>You&#039;re right that transportation is a major source of GHGs &#8212; in the U.S. transportation is roughly 30 percent of all global warming pollution. USCAP (EDF is a member) has a blueprint for legislation that puts transportation fuels under an economy-wide emissions cap, ensuring that we get needed reductions in the trans sector. You can read more about that in the blueprint: <a href="http://us-cap.org/pdf/USCAP_Blueprint.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://us-cap.org/pdf/USCAP_Blueprint.pdf</a>. </p>
<p>On your second question, Congress has yet to decide among the many options for how to distribute allowances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edemeo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2009/03/06/links-cool-graphics-and-magic-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-2568</link>
		<dc:creator>edemeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 01:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2009/03/06/links-cool-graphics-and-magic-tax/#comment-2568</guid>
		<description>Two questions:

(1) How does cap and trade apply to the transportation sector?  That sector is also a major source of GHG.

(2) Will allowances be allocated to electricity suppliers based on the amount of energy supplied to the market, or on the amount of GHG they produce?  The former rewards those with relatively clean energy portfolios, while the latter rewards those that are heavy polluters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two questions:</p>
<p>(1) How does cap and trade apply to the transportation sector?  That sector is also a major source of GHG.</p>
<p>(2) Will allowances be allocated to electricity suppliers based on the amount of energy supplied to the market, or on the amount of GHG they produce?  The former rewards those with relatively clean energy portfolios, while the latter rewards those that are heavy polluters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->