http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/06/05/senate_debate_fact_check/ Blogging the science and policy of global warming Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:13:20 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2 hourly 1 http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/06/05/senate_debate_fact_check/comment-page-1/#comment-1417 mfrancis Sat, 07 Jun 2008 03:54:52 +0000 http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/06/05/senate_debate_fact_check/#comment-1417 Thank you, Charlie! I have sent your data about Jon Kyl's wrong-headed remarks and John Cornyn's erroneous statement to my friends in AZ and TX. Keep fact checking! And of course, we'll be back in 2009 and pass a REAL climate bill which does NOT include nuclear subsidies, puts ALL the emissions permits up for auction and requires 80+ % by 2050. Mary Francis Thank you, Charlie!
I have sent your data about Jon Kyl's wrong-headed remarks and John Cornyn's erroneous statement to my friends in AZ and TX. Keep fact checking! And of course, we'll be back in 2009 and pass a REAL climate bill which does NOT include nuclear subsidies, puts ALL the emissions permits up for auction and requires 80+ % by 2050.
Mary Francis

]]> http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/06/05/senate_debate_fact_check/comment-page-1/#comment-1412 markk Fri, 06 Jun 2008 03:40:15 +0000 http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/06/05/senate_debate_fact_check/#comment-1412 Charlie, Many of your comments are wrong and typical of the one-sided view of the EDF and other groups. As Al Gore never stepped forwrdd to take on challengers of his Inconvenient Truth so too it is easier for the EDF and other organizations to deny differing opinions as it would screw up the agenda behind the scenes which mainly involves $$$. By the way I worked inside the alternative energy industry for 15 years. here is a link to a very recent article which supports Senator Allards comments and to which you should remove your comment as there are questions and it is not "Utterly untrue" . Also, if you knew anything about the state of natural gas and the lack of new power infrastructure you would back down on your comments regarding what energy is going to end up costing. Love to hear your comments on this article, the link of which I am sending you. Mark PS I do belive we need to be resposible about the planet but the JUST SAY NO policy of the EDF and others will bury us. http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23411799-7583,00.html Charlie, Many of your comments are wrong and typical of the one-sided view of the EDF and other groups. As Al Gore never stepped forwrdd to take on challengers of his Inconvenient Truth so too it is easier for the EDF and other organizations to deny differing opinions as it would screw up the agenda behind the scenes which mainly involves $$$. By the way I worked inside the alternative energy industry for 15 years. here is a link to a very recent article which supports Senator Allards comments and to which you should remove your comment as there are questions and it is not "Utterly untrue" . Also, if you knew anything about the state of natural gas and the lack of new power infrastructure you would back down on your comments regarding what energy is going to end up costing. Love to hear your comments on this article, the link of which I am sending you. Mark PS I do belive we need to be resposible about the planet but the JUST SAY NO policy of the EDF and others will bury us. http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23411799-7583,00.html

]]> http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/06/05/senate_debate_fact_check/comment-page-1/#comment-1407 hmccard Thu, 05 Jun 2008 22:36:55 +0000 http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/06/05/senate_debate_fact_check/#comment-1407 Have you wondered why you and other EDF writers have not received many, if any, comments on what you write about this on-going debate of S.3036? Have you wondered why you and other EDF writers have not received many, if any, comments on what you write about this on-going debate of S.3036?

]]>