<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Win the War on Global Warming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/04/17/time_cover_story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/04/17/time_cover_story/</link>
	<description>Blogging the science and policy of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:48:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Climate 411 How to Win the War on Global Warming Blogs &#124; Green Tea Fat Burner</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/04/17/time_cover_story/comment-page-1/#comment-5464</link>
		<dc:creator>Climate 411 How to Win the War on Global Warming Blogs &#124; Green Tea Fat Burner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 02:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/04/17/time_cover_story/#comment-5464</guid>
		<description>[...] Climate 411 How to Win the War on Global Warming Blogs   Posted by root 3 hours ago (http://blogs.edf.org)        Comment from bob321 april 22nd 2008 at 10 18 pm a battery car or a hybrid car or a hydrogen car will all go farther if they but light weight is dangerous in collisions climate 411 is powered by wordpress        Discuss&#160;  &#124;&#160; Bury &#124;&#160;    News &#124; Climate 411 How to Win the War on Global Warming Blogs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Climate 411 How to Win the War on Global Warming Blogs   Posted by root 3 hours ago (<a href="http://blogs.edf.org" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.edf.org</a>)        Comment from bob321 april 22nd 2008 at 10 18 pm a battery car or a hybrid car or a hydrogen car will all go farther if they but light weight is dangerous in collisions climate 411 is powered by wordpress        Discuss&nbsp;  |&nbsp; Bury |&nbsp;    News | Climate 411 How to Win the War on Global Warming Blogs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quentinp</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/04/17/time_cover_story/comment-page-1/#comment-1211</link>
		<dc:creator>quentinp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/04/17/time_cover_story/#comment-1211</guid>
		<description>I think we can celebrate the most famous magazine in the world changing the color of it&#039;s iconic cover (first time ever?) to green.  Also they seem to be pretty clear on Pacala / Socolow&#039;s approach, the importance of cap and trade and other things.  Fabulous levels of awareness and engagement that we could have only dreamed of two years ago.  

So they used a particular noun for the struggle : &quot;war&quot;.  If my grandma f*rted while she was making me a huge Thanksgiving dinner I wouldn&#039;t walk out of the house.  

Quentin

P.S. A word of advice to steve&#039;s hope : People generally like to be in the majority (research shows).  So leading off your argument with &quot;For 8 months I have been trying to get somebody to consider my idea. NOBODY will look at it. &quot; is the strongest incentive most people can get for NOT pursuing it further.  Much better to suggest that it is yet undiscovered / new / about to be launched / that you would simply like some feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we can celebrate the most famous magazine in the world changing the color of it&#039;s iconic cover (first time ever?) to green.  Also they seem to be pretty clear on Pacala / Socolow&#039;s approach, the importance of cap and trade and other things.  Fabulous levels of awareness and engagement that we could have only dreamed of two years ago.  </p>
<p>So they used a particular noun for the struggle : &#034;war&#034;.  If my grandma f*rted while she was making me a huge Thanksgiving dinner I wouldn&#039;t walk out of the house.  </p>
<p>Quentin</p>
<p>P.S. A word of advice to steve&#039;s hope : People generally like to be in the majority (research shows).  So leading off your argument with &#034;For 8 months I have been trying to get somebody to consider my idea. NOBODY will look at it. &#034; is the strongest incentive most people can get for NOT pursuing it further.  Much better to suggest that it is yet undiscovered / new / about to be launched / that you would simply like some feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveshoap</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/04/17/time_cover_story/comment-page-1/#comment-1206</link>
		<dc:creator>steveshoap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/04/17/time_cover_story/#comment-1206</guid>
		<description>Of course we all need to use less fuels, etc.
But, we still have to use cars in the short run.
I have invented a way to make very small cars much safer. 
If small cars are not considered death traps, more Americans will buy them.

Please see my website  safersmallcars.com

For 8 months I have been trying to get somebody to consider my idea. NOBODY will look at it. Car companies, universities, gov labs, famous authors, environmental leaders all have blown me off.

There is a lot of talk about 80% CO2 reduction, but nobody is creating a safe car that will get us 100 or 200 mpg. Most of the proposed high mpg vehicles are overgrown motorcycles or scooters.

The most important thing needed for excellent fuel economy is low car weight (or mass). A battery car or a hybrid car or a hydrogen car will ALL go farther if they are light weight. BUT, light weight is dangerous in collisions. 

Please see my invention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course we all need to use less fuels, etc.<br />
But, we still have to use cars in the short run.<br />
I have invented a way to make very small cars much safer.<br />
If small cars are not considered death traps, more Americans will buy them.</p>
<p>Please see my website  safersmallcars.com</p>
<p>For 8 months I have been trying to get somebody to consider my idea. NOBODY will look at it. Car companies, universities, gov labs, famous authors, environmental leaders all have blown me off.</p>
<p>There is a lot of talk about 80% CO2 reduction, but nobody is creating a safe car that will get us 100 or 200 mpg. Most of the proposed high mpg vehicles are overgrown motorcycles or scooters.</p>
<p>The most important thing needed for excellent fuel economy is low car weight (or mass). A battery car or a hybrid car or a hydrogen car will ALL go farther if they are light weight. BUT, light weight is dangerous in collisions. </p>
<p>Please see my invention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheryl Canter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/04/17/time_cover_story/comment-page-1/#comment-1193</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheryl Canter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/04/17/time_cover_story/#comment-1193</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Global warming is more of a debate than a war.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Global warming is no longer a debate. We&#039;re past the talking stage and into aggressive action. Not a war? Okay - we don&#039;t need a violent metaphor, perhaps. A race? A ...? What should we call aggressive action to prevent dire consequences?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#034;Global warming is more of a debate than a war.&#034;</i></p>
<p>Global warming is no longer a debate. We&#039;re past the talking stage and into aggressive action. Not a war? Okay &#8211; we don&#039;t need a violent metaphor, perhaps. A race? A &#8230;? What should we call aggressive action to prevent dire consequences?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob321</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/04/17/time_cover_story/comment-page-1/#comment-1180</link>
		<dc:creator>bob321</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 03:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/04/17/time_cover_story/#comment-1180</guid>
		<description>This is awful.  War on Global Warming?  Please...  If you want to cover a war, there&#039;s one going on in Iraq.  Global warming is more of a debate than a war.  And, the American public is going very tired of it, since they&#039;re more worried about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whereismyglobalwarming.com/blog/uncategorized/global-warming-more-important-than-doggie-poo/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;doggie poo than global warming&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is awful.  War on Global Warming?  Please&#8230;  If you want to cover a war, there&#039;s one going on in Iraq.  Global warming is more of a debate than a war.  And, the American public is going very tired of it, since they&#039;re more worried about <a href="http://www.whereismyglobalwarming.com/blog/uncategorized/global-warming-more-important-than-doggie-poo/" rel="nofollow">doggie poo than global warming</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidzet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/04/17/time_cover_story/comment-page-1/#comment-1098</link>
		<dc:creator>davidzet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/04/17/time_cover_story/#comment-1098</guid>
		<description>&quot;War on...&quot; rhetoric is silly. Wars on Poverty, Drugs, and Terrorism involve a lot of shock and awe but few results. If the War on GW is pursued with the same command and control mentality (&quot;I command thy carbon to sequester!&quot;), we face a bleak future. Instead of declaring war, let&#039;s stop being stupid, i.e., stop subsidies for &lt;a href=&quot;http://aguanomics.com/2008/03/farm-bill-must-die.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;stupid ideas&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;War on&#8230;&#034; rhetoric is silly. Wars on Poverty, Drugs, and Terrorism involve a lot of shock and awe but few results. If the War on GW is pursued with the same command and control mentality (&#034;I command thy carbon to sequester!&#034;), we face a bleak future. Instead of declaring war, let&#039;s stop being stupid, i.e., stop subsidies for <a href="http://aguanomics.com/2008/03/farm-bill-must-die.html" rel="nofollow">stupid ideas</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
