<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Insurance Industry Crisis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/04/04/insurance_industry_crisis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/04/04/insurance_industry_crisis/</link>
	<description>Blogging the science and policy of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:13:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: davidzet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/04/04/insurance_industry_crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator>davidzet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2008/04/04/insurance_industry_crisis/#comment-1034</guid>
		<description>The insurance industry is &quot;re-insuring&quot; its risk with the Feds to maintain their profits. I am not against markets but bribing a corrupt government (Congress) to take on risk that tax-payers will end up paying for.

Better solution: The government should NOT insure any property. People will buy insurance on the market or learn to stop living in floodplains. 

Politicians near Sacramento have &lt;a href=&quot;http://aguanomics.com/2008/01/growth-versus-nature.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;approved building projects&lt;/a&gt; in flood-prone areas to collect fees (and campaign contributions) from builders. The Feds are trying to declare the area a hazard (so no flood insurance), but the State will end up paying for the inevitable flood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The insurance industry is &#034;re-insuring&#034; its risk with the Feds to maintain their profits. I am not against markets but bribing a corrupt government (Congress) to take on risk that tax-payers will end up paying for.</p>
<p>Better solution: The government should NOT insure any property. People will buy insurance on the market or learn to stop living in floodplains. </p>
<p>Politicians near Sacramento have <a href="http://aguanomics.com/2008/01/growth-versus-nature.html" rel="nofollow">approved building projects</a> in flood-prone areas to collect fees (and campaign contributions) from builders. The Feds are trying to declare the area a hazard (so no flood insurance), but the State will end up paying for the inevitable flood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->