bunnybeer – there were some good editorials in the New York Times and Washington Post on this today.

We are constantly "bombed" by "Global Warming" scare tactics on NPR, and Al Gore is tromping around screaming how the US is so bad and he knows more. Yet you global warming groupies don't look very deep into the science it seems. Dr. Chameides' arguments are not convincing to me, with a fairly good scientific background and MS in Engineering. The many scientists that do not agree that Man is the cause of the minimal if any average warming are much more convincing because they use sound scientific arguments. There is NOT a consensus and the science is NOT settled as the UN cries. The UN is clearly VERY BIASED. We can't let such bias get in the way of sound science. It appears that there is far more evidence that man CANNOT cause climate change to any significant degree doing what we are now doing.
And there are far more important areas to focus our energies.
Here is a collection of REAL scientists.
http://www.climatescience.org.nz/

Take the City of Houston, Texas for example. It is has passed ordinances against Petrochemical companies for emissions of butadiene. The city has set up monitoring and is poised to fine these companies. It is an example of a local government acting within their right.
Link: http://www.houstontx.gov/health/UT.html

I don't want to waste a lot of time responding to silly messages, but I'll post some refuting links. I don't expect you to read them, but others might.

From my previous answer to you:

Bill Chameides – member of the National Academy of Science and science advisor to Environmental Defense – wrote a series on "How We Know Humans Cause Global Warming". If that series doesn't answer every question you have, click on the Science category or do a search on "Chameides". We've addressed Mars, the Sun, etc., etc. I won't repeat it all here. Humans are causing global warming.

MAY? Or MAY NOT equally applies..

This is a victory? A judge who doesn't know what he is talking about? His statement is easily refuted.
CO2 rise FOLLOWS global warming per ice samples. This is easily understood because when it is warmer, plants and trees thrive, producing more CO2. Something else causes the temp rise. It has been shown to correlate with solar cycles. THE SUN is causing it- that is simple to understand because that's what provides our heat and any cycle in the heat source we will see directly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeDPXtSwtFA&feature=related