<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Real Cost of Climate Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/12/11/climate_policy_analytics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/12/11/climate_policy_analytics/</link>
	<description>Blogging the science and policy of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:23:05 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sheryl Canter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/12/11/climate_policy_analytics/comment-page-1/#comment-1397</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheryl Canter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 22:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/12/11/climate_policy_analytics/#comment-1397</guid>
		<description>The quote sounds a little strange from a lay standpoint, I agree. It comes from the economists&#039; practice of quantifying things we usually think about in a qualitative way. They put numbers to everything. No joke here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quote sounds a little strange from a lay standpoint, I agree. It comes from the economists&#039; practice of quantifying things we usually think about in a qualitative way. They put numbers to everything. No joke here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timgo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/12/11/climate_policy_analytics/comment-page-1/#comment-1392</link>
		<dc:creator>timgo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/12/11/climate_policy_analytics/#comment-1392</guid>
		<description>The quote from the Financial Times is quite astonishing. Is it a joke?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quote from the Financial Times is quite astonishing. Is it a joke?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheryl Canter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/12/11/climate_policy_analytics/comment-page-1/#comment-635</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheryl Canter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/12/11/climate_policy_analytics/#comment-635</guid>
		<description>Climate change is happening faster than predicted because of what&#039;s called &quot;feedbacks&quot; that accelerate warming. For example, when ice melts off the North Pole, the Earth is less reflective (dark Earth doesn&#039;t reflect like white ice) and warming accelerates. We are working on a post about climate feedbacks that will be posted before too long.

For the rest of it, see my &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/12/12/time_to_act/#comment-1461&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;previous answer&lt;/a&gt; to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Climate change is happening faster than predicted because of what&#039;s called &#034;feedbacks&#034; that accelerate warming. For example, when ice melts off the North Pole, the Earth is less reflective (dark Earth doesn&#039;t reflect like white ice) and warming accelerates. We are working on a post about climate feedbacks that will be posted before too long.</p>
<p>For the rest of it, see my <a href="http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/12/12/time_to_act/#comment-1461" rel="nofollow">previous answer</a> to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rkcannon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/12/11/climate_policy_analytics/comment-page-1/#comment-634</link>
		<dc:creator>rkcannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 23:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/12/11/climate_policy_analytics/#comment-634</guid>
		<description>Could it be that the climate &quot;damage&quot; happening sooner that scientists predicted is because man is not causing it?  It should not be happening so fast if man IS the cause.  Our increase in CO2 is gradual.  Therfore the cause is something else, and NOT CO2, and this is also shown in ice core samples- the temp goes up then the CO2 rises.  And in the melting ice they are seeing FROZEN TREES!  Did you know the water level was once hundreds of feet higher???

The real concern is the water pollution, mercury in air from coal burning, fluoride in water poisoning the environment, pesticides and other chemicals building up in people, etc etc.  This will kill us off long before global warming from natural causes.  This is smokescreen to hide what is really important!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it be that the climate &#034;damage&#034; happening sooner that scientists predicted is because man is not causing it?  It should not be happening so fast if man IS the cause.  Our increase in CO2 is gradual.  Therfore the cause is something else, and NOT CO2, and this is also shown in ice core samples- the temp goes up then the CO2 rises.  And in the melting ice they are seeing FROZEN TREES!  Did you know the water level was once hundreds of feet higher???</p>
<p>The real concern is the water pollution, mercury in air from coal burning, fluoride in water poisoning the environment, pesticides and other chemicals building up in people, etc etc.  This will kill us off long before global warming from natural causes.  This is smokescreen to hide what is really important!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
