<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Environmental Defense President Testifies Before Congress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/11/16/krupp_testimony/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/11/16/krupp_testimony/</link>
	<description>Blogging the science and policy of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:19:52 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Climate 411 &#38;#187; How a Bill Moves Through Congress - Environmental Defense</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/11/16/krupp_testimony/comment-page-1/#comment-613</link>
		<dc:creator>Climate 411 &#38;#187; How a Bill Moves Through Congress - Environmental Defense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/11/16/krupp_testimony/#comment-613</guid>
		<description>[...] There were also committee-level hearings on the bill. Environmental Defense President Fred Krupp was one of the experts asked to testify. One reason for the additional hearings was a request by minority members for more time for consideration. Extra time for the minority (and, truth be told, all staff) to understand the legislation is a smart move that will pay dividends in the future. After the hearings the bill was scheduled for committee mark-up on December 5th - today. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There were also committee-level hearings on the bill. Environmental Defense President Fred Krupp was one of the experts asked to testify. One reason for the additional hearings was a request by minority members for more time for consideration. Extra time for the minority (and, truth be told, all staff) to understand the legislation is a smart move that will pay dividends in the future. After the hearings the bill was scheduled for committee mark-up on December 5th &#8211; today. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
