Comments on: Climate Change and World Peace http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/10/15/gw_and_peace/ Blogging the science and policy of global warming Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:45:07 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: savvy21 http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/10/15/gw_and_peace/comment-page-1/#comment-566 savvy21 Wed, 17 Oct 2007 07:45:28 +0000 http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/10/15/gw_and_peace/#comment-566 iM FrOM IndIA wAs sTUCK iN StUDies for paSt mANy yeARs did my BAcHELorS anD Now i ACtUALLy realISeD tHAT nEeD OF tHIS hOur iS To sAVe thIS PlaNEt rAThEr Than SIttInG at Home nD makIn frNDs OR looKIng FoR a Job or SMTHIn elSe... Im aLReaDY WorKing On A proJEcT Which cAN ActUALLy sAVe thiS PLaNEt ANd peoPle wILL get AN OPPUrtunity tO EarN MorE WHile sAVING OUR plaNEt... eVErybodY NEeds purchAsE POWer anD ECoNOMIC FREEDoM To wORk foR a CauSe. Im mAKiNg A proJEct WHICH Will actually gIve maSs employmENt tO continents anD with EconomIc freedOm eVerY INDIVIdUAl will BE AbLE to eArn GoOD amouNT of mOney whILE sAvING PlaNET anD I THiNk my PROJect will sAVE PLaNET eArTH... iM FrOM IndIA wAs sTUCK iN StUDies for paSt mANy yeARs did my BAcHELorS anD Now i ACtUALLy realISeD tHAT nEeD OF tHIS hOur iS To sAVe thIS PlaNEt rAThEr Than SIttInG at Home nD makIn frNDs OR looKIng FoR a Job or SMTHIn elSe… Im aLReaDY WorKing On A proJEcT Which cAN ActUALLy sAVe thiS PLaNEt ANd peoPle wILL get AN OPPUrtunity tO EarN MorE WHile sAVING OUR plaNEt… eVErybodY NEeds purchAsE POWer anD ECoNOMIC FREEDoM To wORk foR a CauSe. Im mAKiNg A proJEct WHICH Will actually gIve maSs employmENt tO continents anD with EconomIc freedOm eVerY INDIVIdUAl will BE AbLE to eArn GoOD amouNT of mOney whILE sAvING PlaNET anD I THiNk my PROJect will sAVE PLaNET eArTH…

]]> By: K.C. Weber http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/10/15/gw_and_peace/comment-page-1/#comment-565 K.C. Weber Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:40:05 +0000 http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/10/15/gw_and_peace/#comment-565 CORRECTION TO MY BLOG ABOVE I copied the first web address wrong. The correct one about Dr. William Gray is: http://www.smh.com.au/news/environment/gore-gets-a-cold-shoulder/2007/10/13/1191696238792.html K.C. Weber CORRECTION TO MY BLOG ABOVE

I copied the first web address wrong. The correct one about Dr. William Gray is:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/environment/gore-gets-a-cold-shoulder/2007/10/13/1191696238792.html

K.C. Weber

]]> By: K.C. Weber http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/10/15/gw_and_peace/comment-page-1/#comment-564 K.C. Weber Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:32:05 +0000 http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/10/15/gw_and_peace/#comment-564 I think it was on October 14, that one of the foremost meteorologists, Dr. William Gray, spoke to a packed hall at the University of North Carolina. He said that the theory that helped Al Gore share the Nobel Prize is “ridiculous” and the product of “people who don’t understand how the atmosphere works.” He said, “The human impact on the atmosphere is simply too small to have a major effect on global temperatures.” http://www.smh.com.au/news/environment/gore-gets-a-cold- This comes on the heels of BBC News denouncing Al Gore’s Academy Award winning movie, “An Inconvenient Truth,” saying it has nine errors that are not supported by mainstream scientific consensus. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/7037671.stm I notice that Al Gore and, most who say that mankind is responsible for global warming, say that there is a scientific consensus on this view. However, by saying this, hundreds of other scientists viewpoints are ignored who disagree with this viewpoint. The American Heritage Dictionary defines consensus as “an opinion or position reached by a group AS A WHOLE.” If hundreds of scientists do not agree that man is causing global warming, then there is obviously not a consensus about this. Webster’s New World Dictionary defines consensus as “agreement, especially in opinion.” Global warming is not something that everyone agrees on. My feeling is that possibly in years to come, it may be said that Al Gore may not have deserved his Academy Award or Nobel Peace Prize. K.C. Weber I think it was on October 14, that one of the foremost meteorologists, Dr. William Gray, spoke to a packed hall at the University of North Carolina. He said that the theory that helped Al Gore share the Nobel Prize is “ridiculous” and the product of “people who don’t understand how the atmosphere works.” He said, “The human impact on the atmosphere is simply too small to have a major effect on global temperatures.”

http://www.smh.com.au/news/environment/gore-gets-a-cold-

This comes on the heels of BBC News denouncing Al Gore’s Academy Award winning movie, “An Inconvenient Truth,” saying it has nine errors that are not supported by mainstream scientific consensus.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/7037671.stm

I notice that Al Gore and, most who say that mankind is responsible for global warming, say that there is a scientific consensus on this view. However, by saying this, hundreds of other scientists viewpoints are ignored who disagree with this viewpoint. The American Heritage Dictionary defines consensus as “an opinion or position reached by a group AS A WHOLE.” If hundreds of scientists do not agree that man is causing global warming, then there is obviously not a consensus about this. Webster’s New World Dictionary defines consensus as “agreement, especially in opinion.” Global warming is not something that everyone agrees on.

My feeling is that possibly in years to come, it may be said that Al Gore may not have deserved his Academy Award or Nobel Peace Prize.

K.C. Weber

]]>