<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VT Court Rejects Automakers&#039; Attempt to Continue Polluting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/09/12/vt_victory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/09/12/vt_victory/</link>
	<description>Blogging the science and policy of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:13:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Climate 411 &#187; EPA Delivers Lump of Coal to America for Holidays - Blogs &#38; Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/09/12/vt_victory/comment-page-1/#comment-1164</link>
		<dc:creator>Climate 411 &#187; EPA Delivers Lump of Coal to America for Holidays - Blogs &#38; Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/09/12/vt_victory/#comment-1164</guid>
		<description>[...] the obligation to regulate global warming pollution. When automakers sued, two federal courts - in Vermont and in California - affirmed states&#8217; rights to proceed with the Clean Cars program. Federal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the obligation to regulate global warming pollution. When automakers sued, two federal courts &#8211; in Vermont and in California &#8211; affirmed states&#039; rights to proceed with the Clean Cars program. Federal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate 411 &#187; States and Cities Lead the Way - Blogs &#38; Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/09/12/vt_victory/comment-page-1/#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator>Climate 411 &#187; States and Cities Lead the Way - Blogs &#38; Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/09/12/vt_victory/#comment-1146</guid>
		<description>[...] for cars and trucks that have been adopted by 14 states. When automakers challenged this, a Vermont federal judge upheld its legality. (The EPA still must approve the new standards before they can be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for cars and trucks that have been adopted by 14 states. When automakers challenged this, a Vermont federal judge upheld its legality. (The EPA still must approve the new standards before they can be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teenspirit24</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/09/12/vt_victory/comment-page-1/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>teenspirit24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/09/12/vt_victory/#comment-520</guid>
		<description>I think that this is one of the best controversies for the state.Not only are they the state that uses less cars but they are showing the world that they care about what is happening to the environment.I think it stupid for the automakers to say that they wont sell to the state, its only making less investment for themselves.I&#039;m sure that it would cost more but in the long run if they make cars more fuel efficient and safe they will gain more money, people well buy more cars in Vermont and other states well declare the same problem and agree to Vermont&#039;s law. This will increase the profit of the automakers company.It doesn&#039;t matter where the law comes from first, nothing starts out big everything starts small.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that this is one of the best controversies for the state.Not only are they the state that uses less cars but they are showing the world that they care about what is happening to the environment.I think it stupid for the automakers to say that they wont sell to the state, its only making less investment for themselves.I&#039;m sure that it would cost more but in the long run if they make cars more fuel efficient and safe they will gain more money, people well buy more cars in Vermont and other states well declare the same problem and agree to Vermont&#039;s law. This will increase the profit of the automakers company.It doesn&#039;t matter where the law comes from first, nothing starts out big everything starts small.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captainlaser</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/09/12/vt_victory/comment-page-1/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>captainlaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/09/12/vt_victory/#comment-519</guid>
		<description>Congratulations to Vermont and particularly to Judge Sessions for his wise ruling.

I &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/9/13/161657/782&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;posted&lt;/a&gt; a similar notice on DailyKos after Jim Hansen distributed the verdict.

A trip of a thousand miles is made one step at a time.

Nice post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations to Vermont and particularly to Judge Sessions for his wise ruling.</p>
<p>I <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/9/13/161657/782" rel="nofollow">posted</a> a similar notice on DailyKos after Jim Hansen distributed the verdict.</p>
<p>A trip of a thousand miles is made one step at a time.</p>
<p>Nice post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->