<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Synergies in Efficiency plus Renewables</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/08/15/synergies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/08/15/synergies/</link>
	<description>Blogging the science and policy of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:13:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sheryl Canter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/08/15/synergies/comment-page-1/#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheryl Canter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/08/15/synergies/#comment-477</guid>
		<description>Way to go, CaptainLaser! :)

The interesting part of the study was the policy piece - how considering both efficiency and renewables in crafting policy can get much greater results than approaching them separately - 1+1=3. Considering them together lets you time things better, lower and stabilize pricing, smooth geographic bumps, etc. It&#039;s obvious when you think about it, but in practice the two are not usually considered together - e.g. tax credits for renewables don&#039;t take efficiency into account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to go, CaptainLaser! :)</p>
<p>The interesting part of the study was the policy piece &#8211; how considering both efficiency and renewables in crafting policy can get much greater results than approaching them separately &#8211; 1+1=3. Considering them together lets you time things better, lower and stabilize pricing, smooth geographic bumps, etc. It&#039;s obvious when you think about it, but in practice the two are not usually considered together &#8211; e.g. tax credits for renewables don&#039;t take efficiency into account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captainlaser</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/08/15/synergies/comment-page-1/#comment-476</link>
		<dc:creator>captainlaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 01:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/08/15/synergies/#comment-476</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Sheryl.  S not C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Sheryl.  S not C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captainlaser</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/08/15/synergies/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>captainlaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 01:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/08/15/synergies/#comment-475</guid>
		<description>Cheryl, they go hand in hand.

This year we replaced our fridge and our air conditioner (both about 10 years old).  Our  3 monthly energy bill dropped by 30%.

Buying green energy in Maryland is going to cost me a premium of 20-30%.

It&#039;s a wash for me financially but without a doubt a big win environmentally.  We&#039;re going wind power in our house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheryl, they go hand in hand.</p>
<p>This year we replaced our fridge and our air conditioner (both about 10 years old).  Our  3 monthly energy bill dropped by 30%.</p>
<p>Buying green energy in Maryland is going to cost me a premium of 20-30%.</p>
<p>It&#039;s a wash for me financially but without a doubt a big win environmentally.  We&#039;re going wind power in our house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->