<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Supreme Court Victories</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/04/02/supreme_court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/04/02/supreme_court/</link>
	<description>Blogging the science and policy of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:19:52 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lawsuit Filed in Court of Appeals to Enforce Massachusetts v. EPA Climate Change Case &#171; LAW OF THE LAND</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/04/02/supreme_court/comment-page-1/#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawsuit Filed in Court of Appeals to Enforce Massachusetts v. EPA Climate Change Case &#171; LAW OF THE LAND</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 01:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/04/02/supreme_court/#comment-998</guid>
		<description>[...] in Court of Appeals to Enforce Massachusetts v. EPA Climate Change&#160;Case    One year ago, the Supreme Court rejected the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) claim that it lacked legal authority to regulate global warming pollution. EPA administrator Stephen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in Court of Appeals to Enforce Massachusetts v. EPA Climate Change&nbsp;Case    One year ago, the Supreme Court rejected the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) claim that it lacked legal authority to regulate global warming pollution. EPA administrator Stephen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate 411 &#187; Legal Action to Compel EPA Compliance with Supreme Court - Blogs &#38; Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/04/02/supreme_court/comment-page-1/#comment-990</link>
		<dc:creator>Climate 411 &#187; Legal Action to Compel EPA Compliance with Supreme Court - Blogs &#38; Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/04/02/supreme_court/#comment-990</guid>
		<description>[...] year ago, the Supreme Court rejected the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) claim that it lacked legal authority to regulate global warming pollution (for example, from vehicle [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year ago, the Supreme Court rejected the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) claim that it lacked legal authority to regulate global warming pollution (for example, from vehicle [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate 411 &#38;#187; Environmental Groups Put EPA on Notice - Environmental Defense</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/04/02/supreme_court/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Climate 411 &#38;#187; Environmental Groups Put EPA on Notice - Environmental Defense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 20:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/04/02/supreme_court/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>[...] In 2005, California petitioned the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for permission to establish its own, stricter tailpipe emissions standards. Nearly two years have passed, and EPA still has not ruled on the request - despite a recent Supreme Court ruling that EPA has the authority to regulate tailpipe emissions. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In 2005, California petitioned the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for permission to establish its own, stricter tailpipe emissions standards. Nearly two years have passed, and EPA still has not ruled on the request &#8211; despite a recent Supreme Court ruling that EPA has the authority to regulate tailpipe emissions. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
