<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carbon Offsets Count</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/03/08/carbon_offsets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/03/08/carbon_offsets/</link>
	<description>Blogging the science and policy of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:13:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Climate 411 &#187; Agricultural Offsets - Blogs &#38; Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/03/08/carbon_offsets/comment-page-1/#comment-1159</link>
		<dc:creator>Climate 411 &#187; Agricultural Offsets - Blogs &#38; Podcasts - Environmental Defense Fund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/03/08/carbon_offsets/#comment-1159</guid>
		<description>[...] Some feel that offsets are just a way for people to absolve themselves of guilt without making difficult changes. For example, someone who drives a gas-guzzling hummer can buy offsets and then say they aren&#8217;t contributing to global warming. Of course it&#8217;s better if people minimize their emissions then offset the rest. But regardless, offsets lead to less greenhouse gas emissions, and that&#8217;s a good thing. (To learn more about offsets, see this earlier post.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some feel that offsets are just a way for people to absolve themselves of guilt without making difficult changes. For example, someone who drives a gas-guzzling hummer can buy offsets and then say they aren&#039;t contributing to global warming. Of course it&#039;s better if people minimize their emissions then offset the rest. But regardless, offsets lead to less greenhouse gas emissions, and that&#039;s a good thing. (To learn more about offsets, see this earlier post.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheryl Canter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/03/08/carbon_offsets/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheryl Canter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 18:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/03/08/carbon_offsets/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Junk - that&#039;s a silly comment. The fact is, cap-and-trade can be incredibly effective. Witness what happened with acid rain, which was solved through a cap-and-trade program. We met our goals at a tenth of the anticipated costs. Here&#039;s a link with more info:

http://www.environmentaldefense.org/documents/645_SO2.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Junk &#8211; that&#039;s a silly comment. The fact is, cap-and-trade can be incredibly effective. Witness what happened with acid rain, which was solved through a cap-and-trade program. We met our goals at a tenth of the anticipated costs. Here&#039;s a link with more info:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.environmentaldefense.org/documents/645_SO2.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.environmentaldefense.org/documents/645_SO2.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JunkInJunkOut</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/03/08/carbon_offsets/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>JunkInJunkOut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/03/08/carbon_offsets/#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Europeans know very well in future their economies cannot grow much, and they see they cannot remain towards the top. So they craft this carbon cap trade racket to slow down the faster growing economies.
It is important to know what this noise is  all about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Europeans know very well in future their economies cannot grow much, and they see they cannot remain towards the top. So they craft this carbon cap trade racket to slow down the faster growing economies.<br />
It is important to know what this noise is  all about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josephmx</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/03/08/carbon_offsets/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>josephmx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 14:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/03/08/carbon_offsets/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Hi, I have just seen test data on a new product developed in Brazil and will be available here in the US very soon. It is called the Blade by Sabertec www.sabertec.org - They had the product tested at an EPA approved testing lab in Ontario California. This product increases feul economy. The gentleman at the lab told me &quot;it works&quot; he doesnt know how but he said it definately works. The EPA has tested over 109 gas saving products and has not yet seen one work. I tried this on my car and increases my mileage by 2 MPG.  I recomeend anyone who is concerned about emissions from their cars look into this product. I will never drive a car without this product on it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I have just seen test data on a new product developed in Brazil and will be available here in the US very soon. It is called the Blade by Sabertec <a href="http://www.sabertec.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.sabertec.org</a> &#8211; They had the product tested at an EPA approved testing lab in Ontario California. This product increases feul economy. The gentleman at the lab told me &#034;it works&#034; he doesnt know how but he said it definately works. The EPA has tested over 109 gas saving products and has not yet seen one work. I tried this on my car and increases my mileage by 2 MPG.  I recomeend anyone who is concerned about emissions from their cars look into this product. I will never drive a car without this product on it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YahooO2 &#124; RealGood</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/03/08/carbon_offsets/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>YahooO2 &#124; RealGood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 04:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/03/08/carbon_offsets/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>[...] I didn&#8217;t realize offsets, which have become a bit of a corporate greening trend these days in IT are apparently controversial or at least a subject of debate. Hey, anything equivalent to taking 25K cars off the streets seems like a good thing, net effect or not it&#8217;s a step in the right direction and hopefully will cause others to outdo each other and compete to be more green than the next guy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I didn&#38;#8217;t realize offsets, which have become a bit of a corporate greening trend these days in IT are apparently controversial or at least a subject of debate. Hey, anything equivalent to taking 25K cars off the streets seems like a good thing, net effect or not it&#38;#8217;s a step in the right direction and hopefully will cause others to outdo each other and compete to be more green than the next guy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One/Change &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; Yahoo goes carbon neutral</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/03/08/carbon_offsets/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>One/Change &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; Yahoo goes carbon neutral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/03/08/carbon_offsets/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>[...] We think our offset program counts, but since this is a new and emerging market, we expect to learn as we go, and we’ll be transparent with you along the way. In fact, we’d like your help in all this — we want your inventive and creative ideas for potential offset projects. Please weigh in over at Yahoo! Answers. And read more about our overall approach here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We think our offset program counts, but since this is a new and emerging market, we expect to learn as we go, and we’ll be transparent with you along the way. In fact, we’d like your help in all this — we want your inventive and creative ideas for potential offset projects. Please weigh in over at Yahoo! Answers. And read more about our overall approach here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#38;#8217;t even leave a footprint - Yodel Anecdotal</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/03/08/carbon_offsets/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#38;#8217;t even leave a footprint - Yodel Anecdotal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/03/08/carbon_offsets/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>[...] We think our offset program counts, but since this is a new and emerging market, we expect to learn as we go, and we&#8217;ll be transparent with you along the way. In fact, we&#8217;d like your help in all this — we want your inventive and creative ideas for potential offset projects. Please weigh in over at Yahoo! Answers. And read more about our overall approach here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We think our offset program counts, but since this is a new and emerging market, we expect to learn as we go, and we&#38;#8217;ll be transparent with you along the way. In fact, we&#38;#8217;d like your help in all this — we want your inventive and creative ideas for potential offset projects. Please weigh in over at Yahoo! Answers. And read more about our overall approach here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate 411 &#38;#187; Cheat Offsetting? - Environmental Defense</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/03/08/carbon_offsets/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Climate 411 &#38;#187; Cheat Offsetting? - Environmental Defense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/03/08/carbon_offsets/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>[...] Carbon offsets have been in the news a lot lately because Al Gore said he used them, much to the derision of some misinformed people (see my post on carbon offsets). The funniest of these potshots came from the Web site cheatneutral.com, which says: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Carbon offsets have been in the news a lot lately because Al Gore said he used them, much to the derision of some misinformed people (see my post on carbon offsets). The funniest of these potshots came from the Web site cheatneutral.com, which says: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Chameides</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/03/08/carbon_offsets/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Chameides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/03/08/carbon_offsets/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>There was a good article in the &lt;em&gt;NY Times&lt;/em&gt; the other day about carbon offsets - worth a look:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/09/opinion/09easterbrook.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a good article in the <em>NY Times</em> the other day about carbon offsets &#8211; worth a look:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/09/opinion/09easterbrook.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/09/opinion/09easterbrook.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enrique</title>
		<link>http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/03/08/carbon_offsets/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 16:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.edf.org/climate411/2007/03/08/carbon_offsets/#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Hi Bill:

    I am not rejecting carbon trade.  For everything I have read and I am just a citizen,  Even if we stop producing C02 right now, the Earth will continue to warm up.
     There are 150 plus coal-plants in the drawing board in the U.S. alone.
     I completel agree with you.  Every little thing helps.  The fastest way to stop the madness is to change our beliefs that consumption is the key to happiness.
     For example,  I will be complete off the energy grid in 5 years.  In order to that, I need to install solar panels which it  will cost around $18,000.  Well, There is a trade-off.  I won&#039;t be buying a new car either.
     The mantra could be dream globably, act locally, go solar and buy a hydrogen power car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bill:</p>
<p>    I am not rejecting carbon trade.  For everything I have read and I am just a citizen,  Even if we stop producing C02 right now, the Earth will continue to warm up.<br />
     There are 150 plus coal-plants in the drawing board in the U.S. alone.<br />
     I completel agree with you.  Every little thing helps.  The fastest way to stop the madness is to change our beliefs that consumption is the key to happiness.<br />
     For example,  I will be complete off the energy grid in 5 years.  In order to that, I need to install solar panels which it  will cost around $18,000.  Well, There is a trade-off.  I won&#039;t be buying a new car either.<br />
     The mantra could be dream globably, act locally, go solar and buy a hydrogen power car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->